A dual fuel system is worth the higher investment cost

About five years ago, I made the investment into a dual fuel system for my home.

Combining a heat pump rather than an air conditioner with a heater is quite high-priced, however, for the drastic weather conditions in my local area, the benefits make the added cost worthwhile.

My fantastic friend and I expect temperature changes from negative twenty to ninety degrees. My fantastic friend and I experience excessive amounts of snow, dangerous wind chill, high humidity, chilly rain and just about every type of weather challenge. For the majority of the year, my fantastic friend and I rely on either the heating or cooling system. There is seldom an opportunity to open the windows and simply care about some fresh air. The cost of indoor temperature control is responsible for approximately fifty percent of the house energy budget. In cooling mode, a heat pump performs exactly like a central air conditioner. It uses refrigerant to pull heat out of the indoor environment and deliver it outdoors, creating a cooling effect. The fortune of a heat pump is that it can also deliver heating. When the conditions cool off, the operation literally reverses the flow of refrigerant. The system takes fortune of ambient heat available in the outdoor air and supplies it into the home after comimportant it to a higher temperature. Because the process doesn’t burn fossil fuels, it eliminates concerns with carbon monoxide and other redhome gasses. A heat pump is especially environmentally friendly and energy efficient. It costs considerably less to run than the heater. Unfortunately, the heat pump struggles to keep up with demand once the temperature drops below chilly. In a dual fuel system, the heater automatically takes over and maintains comfort for as long as necessary. As the primary source of temperature control, the heat pump significantly trims our energy costs.


wifi thermostat